www.onlinemba
may be right, but I feel that their argument will not resonate with a large portion of our population. Unless someone’s tax
dollars go in part for Head Start, public education, and higher education, some
people may never have the opportunity to work at jobs in which they pay in that
much. Besides, for those families living from paycheck to paycheck, finding out
that they may get more in retirement than they pay in is cold comfort.
Last year, I wanted an itemized
bill. At that point, my husband and I had paid $24,000 for the wars in
Afghanistan, Iraq, and Pakistan according to an average estimate and I wasn’t
happy about continuing to pay for this. The human costs of the war were of
course way too high but that needs to be the subject of a whole other article.
This year, I tried to look up the updated monetary cost and there were many
divergent estimates. On www.costofwar.com
the numbers kept ticking to the point that I couldn’t keep up. The ticking numbers hurt my
eyes. According to the Center for Strategic And International Studies, the OMB
estimates we’ve spent 198.2 billion on those wars in Fiscal Years 2012 and
2013. Wickipedia’s article estimates $3.2-3.4 trillion altogether and a
Reuter’s article estimates $3.7 million. Whichever estimate is correct, I
believe that my share is too much. With the war in Iraq supposedly over except
for the contractors and the Afghanistan War winding down, surely we have some
money left over for Head Start, education, and other social safety net programs
such as Food Stamps and Medicaid. If we don’t invest in people during the
earlier stages of their lives, they may never live to pay those taxes. It’s
time to end this game of war including the contractors’ involvement and to play
something else. How about school?
No comments:
Post a Comment